My status
We now have the ability to take calls via Skype (PC to PC) and (Phone to PC) our 888 number is still good to go.
 
  Create an account Home  ·  Articles  ·  Downloads  ·  Video Library  ·  Forums  ·  Chat Room  ·  aStore

 
Subscribe Today
You are not a Gold Member of InfidelGuy.com.

Other Payment Options

Search IG.com



Menu
· Home
· FAQ
· Downloads
· Video Library
· Forums
· Chat Room
· Recommend Us
· Link to Us
· Stories Archive
· Arcade
· Web Links
· Contact Us
· Your Account



Sponsors
Church of Reality
 

Memberships


Heh

Popular Articles
· Is Heaven The Sky?
· Questions About God and The Supernatural
· 10 Atheistic Arguments
· Famous Black Freethinkers
· High School Talk about Disbelief
· A Church Presentation
· 2nd Kings 2:23 - A Story of God's Love

Random Games
Asteroids

High Score set by
SarahJ
with 149730

Other Social Pages
IG''s Myspace Page

IG FaceBook Page Button

IG Frappr Map Button

Newgrounds Banner - A Flash Site

BP Logo

Advertise With Us

* Advertise With Us

The Infidel Guy Show: Forums

infidelguy.com :: View topic - Barrack Obama on Religion and Politics

View next topic
View previous topic
Post new topic   Reply to topic
Author Message
Anomalie
Just Arrived

Gold Member



Joined: Apr 05, 2005
Posts: 6

PostPosted: Mon Feb 11, 2008 4:08 am Reply with quote Back to top

http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid353515028?bctid=416343938

A very interesting speech by Barrack Obama on the religion and politics. He makes some quite ballsy statements, for a politician, on biblical inerrancy, abortion and separating church and state. He draws the line pretty much exactly where I would like it to be drawn.

What do you guys think?
View user's profile Send private message
Brian37
Master of Logic
Master of Logic





Joined: Oct 04, 2003
Posts: 9384

PostPosted: Tue Feb 12, 2008 6:23 am Reply with quote Back to top

I aint voten for no darkie! Razz

(Note to self: Start running, they're bringing the clubs and torches to get you Brian37)

All kidding aside.


I do get the sense of a genuine disire to seek overlap. I do get the sense that he wants the government partisipation to be extended, via mentioning Jews and Muslims being brought in. I loved the fact that in front of a church congregation that he said that one of his family members was an atheist. And he also said that he would rather have a secular politician state their values than pretend to be something that they are not.

So it was certainly a positive move toward more inclusion in political voices.

HOWEVER, I susspect that he is pushing the bounderies but still pandering to maintian a religious vote.

It still bothers me that politicians go into churches at all. If Obama says he wants to bridge the gap, for example, between black baptists and white evangelicals, in seeking overlap, which IS possible once you get past Robterson and Keys. But it seems a stumbling block if that Evangelical sees you "winking" to your side while extending your hand to the other.

Again, if he wants that, and I agree with the common law overlap and that morals can transend, then he needs to invite all citizens to a neutral setting.

I am not 100 percent happy with all the speech. But it is a definate improvement and DOES seem to widen the umbrella called America. In all seriousness, as long as I dont recieve another unwanted spam from his handlers(campain organizers) I will vote for him.

Not because I agree with everything said in that speech. But out of all the candidates he does truely seem to not want anyone, theist or atheist left out of having a voice.

But, he seems to downplay "God" in the pledge being unimportant and that bugs me for the same reason he stated in his speech about Keys speeking for him as a Christian. THAT IS WHY "GOD" should not be in the pledge. For the same reason it is NOT in the oath of office, because it means something different to everyone else.

He isnt my utopian canidate, but he certainly opened alot of doors to minorities, not just black Christians, in that speech. For right now, he has my vote.
View user's profile Send private message
realityslayer
Just Arrived





Joined: Feb 12, 2008
Posts: 5
Location: Charleston, SC

PostPosted: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:59 am Reply with quote Back to top

I enjoyed this speech. He said a lot of ballsy stuff here, especially considering his immediate audience, for example '...religious people don't have a monopoly on morals..., or ...his father was an atheist, his mother was a freethinker and that he had and still has doubts. There is no doubt or argument that he is pandering to the religious, but that is his job right now. He is applying for a job to represent everyone, religious people included.

Don't get caught up in hatred. A church is just a building. Being bothered (because you're an atheist) that politicians go into churches is equivalent to a vegetarian protesting a politician giving a speech in a greasy-spoon restaurant serving hamburgers and cheese steaks! You have to go where people are. I haven't done any research, but I'm willing to bet that Barack (or any other politician, for that matter) gives more speeches in religious-neutral, public, atheist-approved spaces than he does in churches.

For the record, I don't believe that any god(s) exists. But, let's be real. A lot of people in America do believe in the supernatural. Politicians can't pretend that these people aren't important if they want to get elected or stay in office. Even so, this speech kept this audience's ego in check and always included statements which included people of faith as well as those without.

Overall a good, balanced speech. I have to agree with Brian37, out of all of the candidates, he has my vote.
View user's profile Send private message
satansballs
Intern
Intern





Joined: Oct 26, 2003
Posts: 242
Location: Arizona

PostPosted: Fri Mar 21, 2008 6:53 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Why was he not saying this 6 months Ago? He did this Because he Had to.I'm Not Impressed.People Forget, He's Still a Politician.
View user's profile Send private message
jcgadfly
Grand Poster
Grand Poster





Joined: Jan 16, 2003
Posts: 1414
Location: Bloomington IN

PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 3:43 am Reply with quote Back to top

And then he pulls this crap..

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/02/us/politics/02campaigncnd.html?hp=&adxnnl=1&adxnnlx=1214931390-8W6UQGnnR6WJZ5T0oouqhw

Obama Plan Would Expand Faith-Based Program


Article Tools Sponsored By
By JEFF ZELENY and JOHN M. BRODER
Published: July 2, 2008

With an eye toward courting evangelical voters, Senator Barack Obama is presenting a plan on Tuesday to expand President Bush’s program of investing federal money in religious-based initiatives that are intended to fight poverty and perform the work of social services.

“The fact is, the challenges we face today — from saving our planet to ending poverty — are simply too big for government to solve alone,” Mr.
Obama is expected to say, according to a prepared text of his remarks.
“We need all hands on deck.”

<snip>
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
ArisSlatr
Grand Poster
Grand Poster





Joined: Feb 09, 2004
Posts: 1334
Location: NY - Guess where and you get a cookie!

PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:20 am Reply with quote Back to top

Seriously,

I was so happy where this was going. Now it looks like he's pandering to mixing religion and state!
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
jcgadfly
Grand Poster
Grand Poster





Joined: Jan 16, 2003
Posts: 1414
Location: Bloomington IN

PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:23 am Reply with quote Back to top

Sorry to wreck it for you...
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
ArisSlatr
Grand Poster
Grand Poster





Joined: Feb 09, 2004
Posts: 1334
Location: NY - Guess where and you get a cookie!

PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 6:25 am Reply with quote Back to top

You should be. This got me so riled up I had to pretend to be surprised a politician lied. Now the real question is can Obama redeem himself?
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger ICQ Number
Cygnus
Graduate Thinker
Graduate Thinker





Joined: Mar 26, 2008
Posts: 519

PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:53 pm Reply with quote Back to top

John McCain would be no better than Barak in matters of faith. I would vote Obama over McCain any day. At least Obama is much more tolerating and progressive towards these matters and I myself do not intend to be a single issue voter.

_________________
К чёрту вечность, какой в ней прок?
View user's profile Send private message
jcgadfly
Grand Poster
Grand Poster





Joined: Jan 16, 2003
Posts: 1414
Location: Bloomington IN

PostPosted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 8:56 pm Reply with quote Back to top

Agreed, Cygnus.

I'd vote in a ham on rye over John McCain. I just hate seeing politicians suck up to the Religious Right.
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
kmisho
Grand Poster
Grand Poster

Gold Member



Joined: Dec 06, 2005
Posts: 1678
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:27 am Reply with quote Back to top

Don't forget it was the most radical fundies that despised the idea of a faith-based initiative because ::gasp:: some money might end up in the hands of Buddhists or Muslims and not just Christians.

When it was republicans offering it, there was a nod-nod-wink-wink understanding that money would be mainly funnelled into christianity. They won't get these covert assurances from Obama.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jcgadfly
Grand Poster
Grand Poster





Joined: Jan 16, 2003
Posts: 1414
Location: Bloomington IN

PostPosted: Thu Jul 03, 2008 3:15 am Reply with quote Back to top

kmisho wrote:
Don't forget it was the most radical fundies that despised the idea of a faith-based initiative because ::gasp:: some money might end up in the hands of Buddhists or Muslims and not just Christians.

When it was republicans offering it, there was a nod-nod-wink-wink understanding that money would be mainly funnelled into christianity. They won't get these covert assurances from Obama.


We can hope. Unfortunately, my suspicion is that Obama will want to avoid being labeled as a closet Muslim that he'll go overboard helping the fundies.
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
kmisho
Grand Poster
Grand Poster

Gold Member



Joined: Dec 06, 2005
Posts: 1678
Location: Richmond, Virginia USA

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 3:12 am Reply with quote Back to top

jcgadfly wrote:
kmisho wrote:
Don't forget it was the most radical fundies that despised the idea of a faith-based initiative because ::gasp:: some money might end up in the hands of Buddhists or Muslims and not just Christians.

When it was republicans offering it, there was a nod-nod-wink-wink understanding that money would be mainly funnelled into christianity. They won't get these covert assurances from Obama.


We can hope. Unfortunately, my suspicion is that Obama will want to avoid being labeled as a closet Muslim that he'll go overboard helping the fundies.

I don't think this is very likely because on the other hand going overboard would look like he's compensating, i.e. that he really is a closet Muslim and thus fighting extra hard keep the secret.

This is how negative propaganda works. Apathy from the target looks like confirmation. Outright denial looks even more like confirmation.
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Cygnus
Graduate Thinker
Graduate Thinker





Joined: Mar 26, 2008
Posts: 519

PostPosted: Fri Jul 04, 2008 11:42 am Reply with quote Back to top

Well, he is probably pandering to someone at any rate which is just what politicians do.

_________________
К чёрту вечность, какой в ней прок?
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:       
Post new topic   Reply to topic

View next topic
View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001-2007 phpBB Group
All times are GMT + 10 Hours
Forums ©

 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 1999 by Infidel Guy TM

RSS FEEDS* You can syndicate our news and blog using the file backend.php
* You can syndicate our forums using the file forumsbackend.php
* Our podcast RSS Feed (may change soon)



The Infidel Guy Version 8.5 Coding provided by RavenPHPScripts and NukeCoder.com


(Original PHP-Nuke Code Copyright © 2004 by Francisco Burzi)
Page Generation: 0.18 Seconds