Is Eyedunno a suppressive?

Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 5:24 am

In response to the never-ending stream of ad homs on the 12 reasons to reject fluoridation thread, I thought we'd settle it once and for all. No way to get to the bottom of things than by applying democracy to scientologist doctrine!

Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 10:27 am

Eyedunno is clearly a supresive. Reading his posts make my gallbladder hurt.

Posted: Wed May 14, 2008 4:29 pm

bagnasty wrote:

Reading his posts make my gallbladder hurt.

Not sure if I'm allowed to, but I voted yes. Laughing

Graduate Thinker Joined: Mar 26, 2008 Posts: 515

If those wacky $cientologists really reviewed everyone, they would say that about 60% of the population is this way (L. Ron said 2.5% of humans are suppressive).

What a cult. They say that suppressives cannot change their minds and are stubborn, but take a look at church followers! Their 'bullbaiting' as shown in Mark Bunker's (aka the bearded wise man) video, would be considered evidence of an SP if it was done by someone outside the church.

Newbie First Class Joined: May 03, 2008 Posts: 33

scientlogist are the bigest suppresors of reality thats for sure

Posted: Thu May 15, 2008 2:56 pm

Cygnus wrote:

If those wacky $cientologists really reviewed everyone, they would say that about 60% of the population is this way (L. Ron said 2.5% of humans are suppressive).

What a cult. They say that suppressives cannot change their minds and are stubborn, but take a look at church followers! Their 'bullbaiting' as shown in Mark Bunker's (aka the bearded wise man) video, would be considered evidence of an SP if it was done by someone outside the church.

What surprises me more is that this guy is apparently a Freezoner. I had never run into a Freezoner before, but I suspected they were at least more amenable to reason than Scientolologists, since their movement ISN'T a con, they don't have the same power structure, and they don't employ harassment and legal teams. But based on this one encounter, it seems that their way of reacting to challenges to their beliefs is similar: the belief that those who disagree are guilty of horrible crimes is all you need in your defense.

As for the Mark Bunker videos (and others), man, the Scientology Death Stare is freaky as fuck. They're actually trained to do that and seem to consider it a sign of emotional strength. Meanwhile anybody not on the Bridge to Total Freedom is wishing they'd reconsider their stance toward psychiatric medication...

Graduate Thinker Joined: Mar 26, 2008 Posts: 515

They're still living on Hubbard doctrine and dogma, the Freezoners, so they're still crazy as hell in my book.

Posted: Fri May 16, 2008 4:50 pm

Yeah. It's pretty much all the craziness, stupidity, and hilarity of Scientolology without the money, mafia tactics, and destruction of lives. So you can make fun of them without feeling at all guilty for taking them so lightly. I don't feel guilty for making fun of Scienos either though, as I think that the last thing we need is people on a wide scale taking their corporation seriously.

Incidentally, I was looking at a lot of Scientology material today. I watched the entire Jason Beghe interview on XenuTV, then I noticed that the Freewinds (the only place to obtain OTVIII) has been impounded due to the discovery of asbestos. Furthermore, this has been known to Scientology since at least 1987.


Create an account	Home · Articles · Downloads · Video Library · Forums · Chat Room · aStore