The morality police on the right always bitch that the left is nothing but a bastion of a free for all, especially when it comes to sex.
Well, it has now come out that McCain's VP Sarah Palin's daughter is UNWED and 5 months pregnant!
When others point out the hypocrisy, they claim, "It is a personal matter"
NO SHIT SHERLOCK!
Just like when Cheney's daughter admitted she was gay.
SO WILL YOU RIGHT WING FUCKWADS stop prying into people's sex lives and mind your own fucking business. Bill's blowjob didn't affect gas prices anymore than this teen's ill advised relationship at such a young age.
And Sarah's family says their teen will marry the 18 year old guy.
WHY? What if they are not in love? What if they discover 1 year from now that they don't want to be together? Are you going to force them to get married and stay married? These idiots would rather compound one mistake on top of another just to protect a utopia!
I myself didn't know my ass for a hole in the ground at that age and I am damn sure glad at 41 I didn't have any kids at all.
So Sarah, being the good parent would rather dictate to her daughter to save face, than to do the right thing, help her raise her daughter, and not force the two to get married. In fact, I would discourage it, even if they claimed they loved each other. What teen in America knows what they want at that age? We are all a bunch of raging hormones at that age.
She made a mistake, if the Republicans want voters to overlook that, then KEEP YOUR FUCKING NOSES OUT OF OTHER PEOPLE'S PRIVATE BUSINESS YOURSELVES!
SvZurich Forum Master
Joined: Oct 07, 2003
Posts: 19077
Location: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC
Posted:
Tue Sep 02, 2008 8:30 pm
Don't forget that she appears to have fired a man who refused to fire her ex-brother-in-law from his State Trooper job.
_________________ Kimberly (HSBUH) aka
Baroness Sylvia von Zurich (the only Goldwater Conservative) endorses the Meadow Party's Bill and Opus for the 2008 Presidential election!
IanfromPerth Newbie
Joined: Mar 07, 2006
Posts: 22
Location: South East Asia
Posted:
Tue Sep 02, 2008 9:02 pm
I don't know the details of this particular pregnancy, but it looks to me like another case of 'just say no' gone wrong. Did the potential vice-president's daughter realise that sex may produce a baby? Did she know about contraception? Just why does a women in the 21st century western world get pregnant unintentionally? To me this smacks of poor parenting, based upon poor xian ethics.
_________________ ----------------------------------------
hello from Thailand (atm)
Brian37 Master of Logic
Joined: Oct 04, 2003
Posts: 9384
Posted:
Wed Sep 03, 2008 7:41 am
SvZurich wrote:
Don't forget that she appears to have fired a man who refused to fire her ex-brother-in-law from his State Trooper job.
Long time hear no evil. I missed you. In any case, that is a weak case at best, if we are to take it at face value, you would be right in that it is against the law.
But, having been a mere judge in a highschool competition(forensics) the year after I graduated, I judged my former competitors from other schools. The looks on their faces when they saw me was one of shock, "He's gonna get even with me"
I am not presuming guilt on this one although it can be construed as such. But even in court cases(as an example) although the default is for a judge to recuse themselves for a conflict of interest, it isn't always nesesary.
I suspect given the face value of what has been reported, one could make a case for conflict of interest, but on any given issue reported by both left and right media, one has to take it with a grain of salt.
I am a big proponent of "presumption of innosence(sp)" especially in this case because the people who are accusing her of this may merely have an axe to grind, WHICH could have been avoided by her not stepping in.
I am not taking her side nor am I assuming her guilt on the cop issue. I can see it happening, but I can also see the other side slinging mud because it was a family issue.
But rest assured I am NOT voting for her simply because she has a vagina. I am not voting for her at all in any case and not because she has a vagina. I am not voting for her because the republican party wants to turn the clock back to colonial pre Revolutionary theocracy.
SvZurich Forum Master
Joined: Oct 07, 2003
Posts: 19077
Location: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC
Posted:
Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:50 pm
*hugs Brian*
Here's a short summary of some things that have come to light.
View next topic View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
* You can syndicate our news and blog using the file