"Friend" is an interesting contextualizing word for anarchy.
Tell me, Spartacus (if that really is you):
Are anarchists "friends" in "community", or
are anarchists "cronies" in a "mob"?
In short, is anarchy
elegant
or is it
brute?
I'm not opposed to anarchy, but this is a point on the subject that I have been seeking elucidation on. Looking forward to reading your opinion.
_________________ Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. - Cardinal Wolsey
AliTheBandit Confident Learner
Joined: Jul 17, 2008
Posts: 71
Location: Germany
Posted:
Sun Dec 20, 2009 4:22 pm
DigitalAtheist wrote:
"Friend" is an interesting contextualizing word for anarchy.
Tell me, Spartacus (if that really is you):
Are anarchists "friends" in "community", or
are anarchists "cronies" in a "mob"?
In short, is anarchy
elegant
or is it
brute?
I'm not opposed to anarchy, but this is a point on the subject that I have been seeking elucidation on. Looking forward to reading your opinion.
Concepts of anarchy reflect the personality of their proponents, therefore spartacus' anarchy would for example be very different from ali's anarchy.
Just like atheists in essence simply don't believe in gods, the only thing that anarchists have in common is that they don't believe that humans need states and governments.
However, I would be quite interested in hearing spartacus' answer, even though I'm fairly sure of what it will be.
_________________ Dog doesn't play dice.
It prefers bone.
MockingGods Master of Logic
Joined: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 5693
Location: Planet Earth
Posted:
Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:44 pm
I think all people who argue such ideology actually want an improved existence and are dissatisfied, to some extent, with what we currently have. This is a noble endeavor none of us have the answers for. Our societies are too complex to respond favorably to any single ideology. This reality might make it impossible to radically enact any change, and change will come slowly as it usually does. It's my impression that nationalism will be the next overarching ideology to begin loosing its gloss.
spartacus The Learned
Joined: Jun 15, 2005
Posts: 120
Posted:
Sun Jan 24, 2010 7:07 am
NASTY CIVILZATION
Since the start of slavery 7000 years ago, humanity has existed as a mass disaster and tragedy. Since 7000 years ago humanity is living a never ending nightmare and horror, physical, emotional, and psychological, a never ending suffering, pain and premature death.
This has nothing to do with nature of wo/mankind; this has nothing to do with evolution, history or fate. We live under a dictatorial system designed and maintained by the ruling few to control, exploit and loot the people and the planet.
The system is maintained by the ugliest and nastiest section of the human population, the cruelest people on earth, because they are willing enough to do what is necessary for the maintenance of their hegemony, hierarchy, thus preserving their system for centuries.
Well the system must be stopped if we want to save what has remained of us and of the planet. Nearly 7 billion people live now on the planet, 90% of which live in permanent and utter misery. Why did so many people agree to succumb to such a condition in the first place? Why did the people let others rule and enslave them? Why did they allow nasty individuals to become a dictator over them and permitting the ruler to rule? Why do not the people rebel and topple the ruler out of existence?
The nasty rulers are brutal in their treatment of the living, and this brutality is what kept them in power. But we are becoming more and more aware of their all encompassing brutality and one day soon we are going to attack.
We are going to terminate this 7000 years of slavery and control, bringing to an end the enslavement of humanity. So get ready people, you have nothing to lose but gain at last a worthwhile living which is deprived from the majority of the world population.
Let’s make this second decade of the 21st century the last decade of the existence of the capitalist system and the state. The time is right, the condition is ripe, and we have all the means necessary for the abolishment of the market and hierarchy.
The time has come for the total elimination of money and its social relation of slavery and terminating the sources and causes of power and profit for ever. Humanity deserves a better existence than this never ending misery and suffering and exploitation, the time has come for liberating humanity from 7000 years of torture, poverty and pain.
The time has arrived to kick the ruler out of his self-made post and stop all the disasters and catastrophes that he is causing just for the purpose of continuing his privilege and authority.
The capitalist system is not a natural system; it is made and maintained by those who want to be on the top of the hierarchy, on top of the food chain, as though I was a fish. Well I am not a fish; I am an anarcho-social revolutionary, who together with the oppressed humanity we are going to destroy capitalism and its state for eternity.
Spartacus Anarchus
BornAgainAthiest Graduate Thinker
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Posts: 669
Location: Here.
Posted:
Mon Jan 25, 2010 10:05 am
Still not talking to anyone, Spartacus?
An anarchist revolution without dialog? Is that what you want?
How about answering some questions before you write another message to nobody in particular?
No, not my questions. The questions that have already been put to you by others!
Deal with them and engage in some dialog - then we might take you seriously!
Stop reciting your mantras and TALK TO US!
Your so-called 'friend' and 'fellow revolutionary',
BornAgainAthiest.
_________________ Nietzsche was wrong - god never lived.
DigitalAtheist Graduate Thinker
Joined: Apr 13, 2009
Posts: 661
Location: Canada
Posted:
Mon Jan 25, 2010 12:25 pm
Surveying these posts, I think that Spartacus is a most interesting specimen of spammer/troll.
There is, of course, not much to tell, because Sparty has not responded to a single question, ever. It is less of an anarchism, than it is
fascism.
– a fascism in which the great leader lurks at the computer and only opens the door when Mom comes to his/her room to deliver supper.
Seriously though, it seems likely that we have here another case of mental illness. The incoherence of rhetoric, lack of willingness to support claims, and religious structure of his/her argument is indicative of some more serious problems. This is not your typical spammer. People get paid money to spam, and who the heck would pay for this?
Googling any one sentence from Sparty's posts reveal that the exact same behaviour (and posts) appear on multiple forums. I recommend two things:
1.
for fellow forum users: ignore this person
(though it appears that most people have caught onto this),
and
2.
a one-time recommendation for Spartacus: seek some qualified help.
_________________ Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. - Cardinal Wolsey
zerilos Newbie
Joined: Dec 08, 2008
Posts: 23
Posted:
Tue Jan 26, 2010 11:58 pm
Anarco-socialism is without a doubt the best example of an oxymoron that I've ever encountered.
The fact that evil occurs in this world does not somehow validate anarco-socialism (even if such a thing were possible). In many ways I see a a lot of similarities between Spartacus' beliefs and religion.
Jason_Harvestdancer Graduate Thinker
Joined: Oct 24, 2005
Posts: 679
Posted:
Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:12 am
When faced with the choice between Capitalism and Anarchy ...
I choose both.
_________________ Nos Laetus Edo Qui Votum Opprimo Nobus
DigitalAtheist Graduate Thinker
Joined: Apr 13, 2009
Posts: 661
Location: Canada
Posted:
Wed Jan 27, 2010 11:54 am
Jason_Harvestdancer wrote:
When faced with the choice between Capitalism and Anarchy ...
I choose both.
Isn't that a quote from Greenspan?
_________________ Be very, very careful what you put into that head, because you will never, ever get it out. - Cardinal Wolsey
MockingGods Master of Logic
Joined: Nov 14, 2002
Posts: 5693
Location: Planet Earth
Posted:
Wed Jan 27, 2010 9:21 pm
Jason_Harvestdancer wrote:
When faced with the choice between Capitalism and Anarchy ...
I choose both.
I'd probably choose neither... given better options.
FullMentalJackpot The Learned
Joined: Jan 11, 2008
Posts: 109
Posted:
Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:31 pm
DigitalAtheist wrote:
Jason_Harvestdancer wrote:
When faced with the choice between Capitalism and Anarchy ...
I choose both.
Isn't that a quote from Greenspan?
If Greenspan was a capitalist as he might claim why did he support and operate the socialist central bank which FIXES or mandates an interest rate based on government fiat? If he was an anarchist why did he not want the interest rate to be set by real savings which would have been outside the control of a central banking authority ?
Jason_Harvestdancer Graduate Thinker
Joined: Oct 24, 2005
Posts: 679
Posted:
Wed Feb 10, 2010 11:57 pm
DigitalAtheist wrote:
Jason_Harvestdancer wrote:
When faced with the choice between Capitalism and Anarchy ...
I choose both.
Isn't that a quote from Greenspan?
Hardly, it's a quote from me. On another board Spartacus started this exact same thread.
_________________ Nos Laetus Edo Qui Votum Opprimo Nobus
spartacus The Learned
Joined: Jun 15, 2005
Posts: 120
Posted:
Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:57 am
Ok with some I shall engage in dialog but with others I will not, for example:
BornAgainAthiest YES dialog
DigitalAtheist NO
THE MODERN CONDITION OF SLAVERY
Most people have to sell their labor power to exist and survive those who don’t work and cannot work, like the unemployed and the poor, find it extremely hard to exist and to survive. Most people work because they don’t have any other choice; it is the only way available to them under the system to survive to the next day.
Yet work is completely unnecessary for the existence of the human race today, yet everyone is working, to be controlled and ruled by the wage. There are those who love their jobs too, the loving slaves, and the miserable and very lonely people. The upper classes don’t need to work because we do everything for them, we do all the work for them so they can continue to remain the upper class and we remain their slaves and servants of substance. The rich live off us, we work and they spend, we labor and they profit, I don’t except this deal, the equation must be changed.
All the people of the world are divided into classes, the class division:
1) Those who exploit the labor of others and rob the planet of its natural resources for their own personal profit – the rich – the ruling class – 3% of the world population.
2) Those who are exploited and have to serve capital and the capitalist for physical survival, the working and middle class – 65% of the world population.
3) Those who cannot work or find a job + the unemployed + the homeless + the paupers – 32% of the world population.
An Anarcho-Social revolution will change all this, it will abolish capitalism, the state, authority, hierarchy and trade. Thus creating a post-law & order world of freedom and universal equality.
This time the revolution is not going to start from a third world country, it shall come from a first world country, as Marx has predicted 50 years before the Bolshevik revolution in Russia. The past is dead and the future is our creation, so let’s make our lives and the lives of all other happier, healthier and free.
Spartacus Anarchus
BornAgainAthiest Graduate Thinker
Joined: Jun 16, 2008
Posts: 669
Location: Here.
Posted:
Fri Feb 19, 2010 2:33 pm
BornAgainAthiest wrote:
spartacus wrote:
BornAgainAthiest - I will communicate - I will answer - I am a revolutionary friend
Well then, 'friend', why not try communicating with MockingGods first? He's been trying to communicate with you since the end of Jan 08. You've got some catching up to do!
BAA.
_________________ Nietzsche was wrong - god never lived.
FullMentalJackpot The Learned
Joined: Jan 11, 2008
Posts: 109
Posted:
Sat Feb 20, 2010 8:13 am
spartacus wrote:
Ok with some I shall engage in dialog but with others I will not, for example:
An Anarcho-Social revolution will change all this, it will abolish capitalism, the state, authority, hierarchy and trade. Thus creating a post-law & order world of freedom and universal equality.
This time the revolution is not going to start from a third world country, it shall come from a first world country, as Marx has predicted 50 years before the Bolshevik revolution in Russia. The past is dead and the future is our creation, so let’s make our lives and the lives of all other happier, healthier and free.
Spartacus Anarchus
Even assuming a first world country becomes socialist or communist there is a fundamental problem. Cost exists, and conditions are not static. Assuming the dialectical process directs us toward socialism and the workers obtain all teh capital and abolish the market how can they engage in a rationalization of costs? Also because conditions are not static the confiscated capital from teh revolution would be able to be managed only for a short term. As conditions change and the capital depreciates or is consumed ( and socialism will only accelerate this because when people share stuff they will overuse it because the the disutilty of overuse is only marginally experienced by the individual in the commons , this is known as the tragedy fo the commons) the lack of a pricing mechanism would result in irrational deployment of resources.
Socialism may be technically efficient, however it can never be economically efficient. Socialism cannot engage in cost calculation.
Further more Marx's labor theory of value Doesn't address why some things like blonde hair or brunette hair, or trustworthiness might be valued. These things dont' necessarily require the imputation of labor time to calculate their cost. Labor does not have intrinsic value. Value is subjective.
Also assuming you could overcome the Von Mises's calculation argument and create some sort of anarcho-syndacalist society ( decentralized socialism). What's to stop black markets from emerging without a state? What's to stop intellectual capital from demanding unequal compensation for it's deployment of skills? An anarchist society woudl have no supervening authority to mandate wage fixation so individual syndicates woudl be free to democratically manage their own little microcosms independent of the overarching global anarchic order. Intellectual capital would compete for additional ownership rights and syndicates, in their self-interest, would yield.
If you are a socialist i might suggest a socialist historian for you to read. Gabriel Kolko's "triumph of conservatism" where he rejects Marx's claim about class interest. One of the many revaluations that marxism is not a scientific process but a psuedo-scientific one that does not result in predictability. Kolko demonstrates that the gilded age was a period when the bourgeois cannibalized each other and horizontal integration failed to yield monopoly protection. It was only after the firms red-discovered "rent seeking" and used that state to consolidate monopoly privilege and worker exploitation that socialism, masquerading as capitalism, gave property ownership and the market a bad name.
Also shoveling food into your mouth is labor. All organisms must perform labor to eat unless it's regurgitated into their stomach from their parents. I'm not sure how you reconcile Marx's alienation concept with teh fact that man has always had to work to obtain his food, or rather to satisfy the animal part of himself before he may become a man. I don't think Marx's alienation concept considers the fact that demand is infinite as Jean Baptist Say would say.
View next topic View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum