Joined: Oct 07, 2003
Posts: 19069
Location: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC
Posted:
Thu Nov 13, 2008 11:58 pm
I know you joined up 2 months before I did, and I think that is cool. On the seniority front though, I am an admin here, and trying to keep the place cleaned up.
Do enjoy posting though. Always good to see an old timer return!
_________________ Kimberly (HSBUH) aka
Baroness Sylvia von Zurich (the only Goldwater Conservative) endorses the Meadow Party's Bill and Opus for the 2008 Presidential election!
baddogma Grand Poster
Joined: Feb 02, 2006
Posts: 1749
Location: Colorado
Posted:
Fri Nov 14, 2008 12:28 am
DemiBlooD wrote:
I never said gods were created by men, not that they couldn't be... I am suggesting a change in the definition of gods though,
I'm perplexed as to why no one is even curious enough to ask me questions about how my ideas work, rather than calling me a troll
...then why call them god/s?
DemiBlooD Intern
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
Posts: 206
Location: Florida
Posted:
Fri Nov 14, 2008 10:51 am
I mean its completely logical, if you can think of human beings like they're any other organism
except almost all other organisms have DNA to tell them exactly what to do, or genetic memory that guides them, or some other system of guidance
but us, we're mostly lost without guidance, why do you think so many people turn to religion for help in the first place?
because they're lost without guidance...
Who do you think could design a construct, like an entire religion, I mean, L. Ron Hubbard said anyone could create a religion, but now Scientology has what, 2 million members?
The point here is, do you think you could create a religion? a religion that would grow to 2 million members?
There's obviously some loophole, or exploitable system, to emotions which allows the creation of an entirely new religion, look at how ridiculous the beliefs of Scientology are, Dianetics?
"The reactive mind is a concept in the Dianetics and Scientology systems of L. Ron Hubbard, referring to that portion of the human mind that is unconscious and stimulus-response"
otherwise known as emotions
DemiBlooD Intern
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
Posts: 206
Location: Florida
Posted:
Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:17 am
I don't call them gods, they call themselves gods, we're the ones who use emotional constructs to try and understand them, rather than logical ones
"So do not fear, for I am with you; do not be dismayed, for I am your God. I will strengthen you and help you; I will uphold you with my righteous right hand."
Isaiah 41:10
But they don't call themselves Gods any more, and why would they? why would they want to distinguish themselves from any other ordinary person, and be the targets of peoples emotions?
Could you imagine it?
real life gods being flesh and blood people, the result of them revealing themselves, they would probably receive worse than racism, we'd probably try to drive them to extinction.
Cygnus Graduate Thinker
Joined: Mar 26, 2008
Posts: 549
Posted:
Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:54 pm
Quote:
I'm perplexed as to why no one is even curious enough to ask me questions about how my ideas work, rather than calling me a troll
What are you suggesting the definition of God be changed to?
What reason should we have to consider your idea?
Is your idea falsifiable?
If it is not falsifiable, then it cannot be proven.
Quote:
I've got seniority over you by a couple of months
And yet, SVZurich has seniority over you by 18,836 posts.
_________________ "Buddha says: "Do not flatter thy benefactor!" Let one repeat this saying in a Christian church: it immediately purifies the air of all Christianity."
-Friedrich Nietzsche
SvZurich Forum Master
Joined: Oct 07, 2003
Posts: 19069
Location: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC
Posted:
Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:41 pm
Sadly, my higher count at AF doesn't carry back over to here. When the boards split, the number was duplicated and continued, and I mostly post there.
_________________ Kimberly (HSBUH) aka
Baroness Sylvia von Zurich (the only Goldwater Conservative) endorses the Meadow Party's Bill and Opus for the 2008 Presidential election!
Ninah Newbie
Joined: Sep 30, 2008
Posts: 14
Posted:
Tue Nov 18, 2008 1:50 am
It always amazes me when some troll claims he/she wants to "challenge or debate" when all they want is someone to agree with them. If you're that lonely - go have a talk with jeebus. He PROMISED to never leave you alone!
_________________ "If you don't understand the purpose of a thing... abuse is inevitable."
DemiBlooD Intern
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
Posts: 206
Location: Florida
Posted:
Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:14 pm
Quote:
What reason should we have to consider your idea?
You're absolutely right, you have no reason at all to consider my idea, the end of theism as it is known to be, atheism and agnosticism...
is of no interest to you.
I won't post any more
SvZurich Forum Master
Joined: Oct 07, 2003
Posts: 19069
Location: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC
Posted:
Tue Nov 18, 2008 11:50 pm
And don't post any less! Stay and mingle!
_________________ Kimberly (HSBUH) aka
Baroness Sylvia von Zurich (the only Goldwater Conservative) endorses the Meadow Party's Bill and Opus for the 2008 Presidential election!
DemiBlooD Intern
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
Posts: 206
Location: Florida
Posted:
Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:01 am
SvZurich wrote:
And don't post any less! Stay and mingle!
And what reason do I have to do so?
I'm not an atheist, theist, or agnostic
I guess you could call me crazy, but I think of myself as a realist
The entire first page of this discussion is people calling me a troll for trying to tell them what I perceive as truth
anywise, my ideas don't really mesh with the rest of society, so I thought I could express them here, but I got shot down before I even started,
so whats the point, really?
Cygnus Graduate Thinker
Joined: Mar 26, 2008
Posts: 549
Posted:
Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:37 am
Quote:
You're absolutely right, you have no reason at all to consider my idea, the end of theism as it is known to be, atheism and agnosticism...
is of no interest to you.
I won't post any more
You are just suggesting things and not saying anything additional to back them up. You could come up with a few explanations for your idea and present them, but that's clearly not what you are doing. I am asking you for arguments/statements/explanations for your position. I also see you haven't bothered answering any of my other questions. I wonder why that is?
Quote:
The entire first page of this discussion is people calling me a troll for trying to tell them what I perceive as truth
Quote:
I'm not an atheist, theist, or agnostic
If you believe your scenario and support the changing of the definition of the word god to support it, then there is no way that you are not a theist.
_________________ "Buddha says: "Do not flatter thy benefactor!" Let one repeat this saying in a Christian church: it immediately purifies the air of all Christianity."
-Friedrich Nietzsche
DemiBlooD Intern
Joined: Aug 02, 2003
Posts: 206
Location: Florida
Posted:
Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:08 pm
Its not your fault really, I decided not to push the topic for several reasons,
1) because I got immediate negative feedback, I expected this anywise
2) because I've been diagnosed mentally ill (specifically for my ideas on good, evil, and free will, which isn't really important)
3) because it might be socially destructive
4) because I was angry at 'gods' for stealing a 'demon' from me, (hahaha, I was possessed, don't ask) and trying to get vengeance by doing this
so I've changed my mind about trying to open peoples eyes.
I'm not a theist because I don't believe gods (as they were) exist any more, I'm not an atheist because I believe they existed at one point in time, and I'm not agnostic, because I have a belief about gods
I guess you could call me a theist for having a belief about gods, but that would be abnormal, I've always been a nonconformist anywise
none of this matters.
SvZurich Forum Master
Joined: Oct 07, 2003
Posts: 19069
Location: 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC
Posted:
Wed Nov 19, 2008 10:47 pm
I want a pet demon! Or at least to befriend one (and maybe sleep with one, depending on its nature and appearance).
_________________ Kimberly (HSBUH) aka
Baroness Sylvia von Zurich (the only Goldwater Conservative) endorses the Meadow Party's Bill and Opus for the 2008 Presidential election!
View next topic View previous topic
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum