Search
Topics
  Create an account Home  ·  Topics  ·  Downloads  ·  Your Account  ·  Submit News  ·  Top 10  
Listen to our podcast
IG Promotional Podcast

Gold Members Feed
Last 100 Shows in descending Order


Menu
· Subscribe!!
· Home
· FAQ
· IG Toolbar
· Listen and Chat
· News
· Downloads
· Video Library
· Forums
· Video Cam
· Recommend Us
· Link to Us
· Stories Archive
· Arcade
· Web Links
· Contact Us
· Your Account

Advertise With Us



Sponsors - Bill Payers

Memberships


Heh

Popular Articles
· Is Heaven The Sky?
· Questions About God and The Supernatural
· 10 Atheistic Arguments
· Famous Black Freethinkers
· High School Talk about Disbelief
· A Church Presentation
· 2nd Kings 2:23 - A Story of God's Love
· Is Evolution True?
· WifeSwap - The Truth

Other Social Pages

2nd Kings 2:23 - A Story of God's Love
Posted on Friday, December 07 @ 08:32:19 PST by infidelguy

Blog By, Reginald Finley Sr
Last Updated: 03-12-2009


Though most religions have deities that do some good for man, we are always reminded also of the power and viciousness of their gods via their holy text. I guess they believe it's supposed to keep us in line. It is commonplace in some religious lore to show their deities as cruel as possible, especially when provoked. A "Don't mess with Texas" theme comes to mind.

How is it that one can believe, follow and worship such cruel gods? Some ancient South American beliefs for instance have very cruel gods that wish for them to sacrifice virgins, rip the hearts out of young men or eat the flesh of their enemies. How can one believe these stories are true and still define, in part, their god/s as "loving"? A "beautiful and wonderful father"? Fear of eternal torture, fear of breaking tradition and fear of being ostracized by friends and family, keep many of the faithful believing despite obvious cruelties and problems.

For the believer of many a stripe in our more modern age, I'd ask if they could possibly believe in a loving god that creates senseless, wanton destruction, created HIV, drowns babies, puppies and kittens. Most decent, religious people respond "Heck no"! Yet, some actually still do believe in murderous and bloodthirsty gods even today! They just don't know what their text says. In most cases, people tend to pick and choose what they want to believe in their "holy" texts and ignore whats uncomfortable. Piccadilly theology.

What is one's litmus test to determine if a god is just too cruel to believe in? Shouldn't we have a cutoff? For instance.. if a holy text had a "true" story in it about how a god, Kaliki Wanka.. sent wild animals to kill many children, just for calling a man bald, I'd have serious doubts about the goodness of that being. I'd probably begin to wonder if such a story is even true as this story doesn't mirror what goodness even means. I'd probably start to wonder, if that's not a true story.. what else isn't true? I suppose I could continue worshiping that being out of fear. But how can true love reside in my heart if I'm in the belief only for fear of my god's wrath?

Would you worship a god that kills children just for calling a man bald? Well, that story is actually in the Christian Holy Bible!

II Kings 2:23-25 (KJV). Reads:

"And he (Elisha) went up from thence unto Bethel: and as he was going up by the way, there came forth little children out of the city, and mocked him, and said unto him, Go up, thou bald head; go up, thou bald head. [23] And he turned back, and looked on them, and cursed them in the name of the LORD. And there came forth two she bears out of the wood, and tare forty and two children of them. [24] And he went from thence to mount Carmel, and from thence he returned to Samaria." [25]

Didn't hear this story in Sunday school now did we?

If you think the KJV is a horrible translation. View the NIV's Version below:

"From there Elisha went up to Bethel. As he was walking along the road, some youths came out of the town and jeered at him. 'Go on up, you baldhead!' they said. 'Go on up, you baldhead!' He turned around, looked at them and called down a curse on them in the name of the Lord. Then two bears came out of the woods and mauled forty-two of the youths."

No matter what version, it's pretty horrible. Are either of these versions honest and accurate though? Let's look at the Hebrew.

The word used here is "baqa'". Baqa` means to cleave, to tear, to break open, to rip in half. Looks like the KJV is closer to the truth than the NIV. Looks like the NIV version tried to soften the blow slightly by saying mauled. Because obviously, one can survive a mauling. I don't know of anyone that has survived being cleaved in half. Imagine that scene at the Theatres, directed by Clive Barker. And to think we worry about violent video games and bloody movies.

OBVIOUS QUESTIONS:

* Why didn't God just send the bears to scare them away?

* How is it possible that these two "she bears" killed all 42 of these children? Were the kids legless? If not, must have been Super Bears to move that fast. Why would God grant them extra power to conduct such a murderous act?

* How in the Hell did this story end up in the "Good Book"?

* Since when is calling someone a bald head worthy of death? It goes on and on.

As mentioned in my Steve Well's interview (visit my show archives @ infidelguy.com), Bears are usually solitary animals and they don't attack large crowds. I suppose they would if they are mentally ill, or under the influence of something. Heh, I guess they were... under the influence of God! Yahweh, had to completely change these bears normal and natural way of living to get them to kill these children. These were essentially, innocent bears.

One apologetic reply is that these children were really adolescents. A gang of vicious teens. This excuse would almost work if it wasn't for the plain reading of the text itself. Elisha, ".. turned back.." or he "turned around.." He was out of harms way. He decided to stop walking away, and turned around to face these "evil teens". He got 'sinfully' angry, "the nerve of those kids insulting a Prophet" (sound familiar?) and cursed them in the name of the Lord.

Some have tried to argue that Elisha did this and not God. Oh really? Now remember, no man has any such supernatural power besides God. Remember Moses? Did he turn a snake into a staff and vice versa? Did Moses have this power? Or was it God? Exactly! Most say it was power bestowed by God. Therefore, God's power was responsible. God is the true source of the curses and miracles in the Bible. Sadly, the Bible never condemns Elisha for this act. And why not? Because God did it. Can't chastise God now can we?

My children can say some crazy stuff now and again such as "pooty head" and "biscuit face" but I would never sic some wild animals on them for being kids. A good scolding should be sufficient.

The II Kings 2:23 story is a reminder of the vengeful, blood-thirsty mindset many believers had during that period. Biblical literalists have a peculiar position to take on this. If the story is 100% true, the Old testament God is cruel and malicious. Who would want to worship that!? Especially in these more enlightened times

Jesus' timing is just right though. As societies began to grow and become more sophisticated and more morally conscious,Yahweh simply did not have the same appeal. Jesus is ushered in as a much needed political replacement. The New Testament however, isn't a replacement for the Old Testament. In fact Jesus makes it clear in:

Matthew 5:18-19
"Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or tittle shall nowise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled. Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven."

So Jesus himself supports many of the OT laws. Isn't this the same God then? Breaking OT laws is punishable by death in most cases.

Is Jesus Yahweh?
Some Christian churches teach that Jesus was here with God since the beginning. In fact, it's believed by many that Jesus is the god Yahweh. But if true, doesn't this mean that Jesus condoned 2 Kings 2:23? World-wide floods that killed cute little bunnies and sleeping babies? Jesus turned people into salt? Jesus is a killer? Jesus did all that? Something is amiss here.

This passage is so disturbing, as well as many other passages, that one has to convince themselves that these stories aren't relevant theologically. They dismiss it as petty. I think this story is just as relevant theologically as God killing the first born of every person and animal in Exodus 11:5. It's an issue of truth and morality.

I ask my Christian thinkers. Why would you believe and support a father that possesses such cruelty?

As I mentioned above, there are many other horrible stories in the Bible. These are a few of hundreds.

SkepticsAnnotatedBible.com is a wonderful resource for discovering those aspects of the Bible that your pastor and ministers will NOT mention or don't even know themselves.

I beg of you. Go! Read The Bible: All of it!


Note:


Re: 2nd Kings 2:23 - A Story of God's Love (Score: 1)
by Divinus on Monday, April 21 @ 13:31:31 PDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
Cursed them. This curse, which was followed by so visible a judgment of God, was not the effect of passion, or of a desire of revenging himself; but of zeal for religion, which was insulted by these boys, in the person of the prophet, and of a divine inspiration; God being determined to punish in this manner the inhabitants of Bethel, (the chief seat of the calf-worship) who had trained up their children in a prejudice against the true religion and its ministers. (Challoner) --- The boys themselves were not so little as not to be aware of the insult they were offering to a minister of the God of Juda; and probably they acted thus out of hatred to him, at the instigation of their idolatrous parents. (Sanctius) (Calmet) --- Lord. He called on him (Menochius) to revenge his own cause, (Haydock) "that the people might learn to take care of their souls, by the fear of death." (St. Augustine) (Du Hamel)



Bald-head. It is not know whether Eliseus was really bald, or only wore his hair short, like the priests of the Lord, and the monks at present. It may also be a term of reproach, of which the emperors Julius Cæsar, Domitian, and Otho, were very sensible. Cæsar wore a crown of laurel, and Otho a sort of false hair, to hide this deformity. (Suetonius) Quod summum formæ decus est, periere capilli. (Petronius) (Calmet)



Re: 2nd Kings 2:23 - A Story of God's Love (Score: 1)
by Robocoastie on Sunday, June 08 @ 01:27:22 PDT
(User Info | Send a Message) http://www.robertreppert.com
Good points Reg. I had to find enough of these passages myself simply by reading the bible and not "bible study guides" before the magnitude of these actions and contradictions to church theology could sink in.

Likewise when I point them out to xians I get the same blank look on their face and answer "so what?" from them that I used to give. From a theologian however the answer is (as I got from a local pastor) along the lines that in those days god had to deal harshly with the people because of how much worse they were due to Christs sacrifice not having occurred yet. (never mind Malachi 3:6 "I am the LORD I change not").



Re: 2nd Kings 2:23 - A Story of God's Love (Score: 1)
by jinxmchue on Tuesday, March 31 @ 08:23:27 PDT
(User Info | Send a Message)
It's interesting that you look up and use the word "baqa" from the Hebrew, but not the word "na'ar," which is erroneously translated as "children" in KJV. In fact, "na'ar" is used elsewhere in the Old Testament in relation to Joseph when he was near or at 30 years of age and Joshua when he was near 50!


Help Us Keep Going

Live Visitor Stats
Welcome, Anonymous
Nickname
Password
(Register)
Membership:
Latest: MaxineMcc
New Today: 460
New Yesterday: 695
Overall: 75335

People Online:
Visitors: 247
Members: 41
Total: 288

Online Now:
01 : AlbertoTa
02 : MaxineMcc
03 : CarltonNa
04 : RichardAl
05 : BenjaminZ
06 : MarceloSN
07 : LucioZ36
08 : IrvinKoch
09 : KrystynaU
10: GenevaCha
11: WillaWals
12: AbelB50
13: Ellen81R
14: NanSpear
15: BerndNeal
16: IKPJeanet
17: DaisyHQX
18: JulieAlmo
19: RandalSho
20: LucilleMa
21: Daniele04
22: MarthaSug
23: MalcolmFr
24: ElmaCDWF
25: JeffCooks
26: MerleHyne
27: loantrent9
28: FaustoZBN
29: Leticia79
30: DarwinSta
31: ReaganAIX
32: SherryQua
33: TobiasMnf
34: ReginaRgt
35: KarolGood
36: StaceyNKRJ
37: SheilaWel
38: SharylEsp
39: KristieSi
40: Dominick7
41: ArnoldYan

Random Games
Space Invaders

High Score set by
millaspa
with 65510

News and Article Archive
Wednesday, February 24
· Book Discussion, ''What Darwin Got Wrong''
Tuesday, January 19
· Atheist Group Responds to 'Jesus Code' Rifle Sights
Saturday, January 16
· Antievolution legislation in Missouri
Friday, January 01
· Science center Sued for Rejecting Anti-Evolution Film
Sunday, December 27
· 29% of Americans say religion ‘out of date’
Monday, December 21
· US Army Major: Lose Evangelical Christian Belief
Sunday, December 13
· Ancient Book of Mark Found Not So Ancient After All
Tuesday, November 24
· The fight over God's secular title.
Tuesday, November 17
· C Street House Loses Tax Exempt Status
Friday, November 13
· Court Rules SC Christian License Plate Unconstitutional
Tuesday, November 03
· Healthcare provision seeks to embrace prayer treatments
Saturday, October 24
· Christopher Hitchens In Sydney: Does Religion Poison Everything?
Friday, October 16
· The Priest and his Family.
Wednesday, October 07
· Supreme Court debates legality of Mojave cross
Monday, October 05
· Conservatizing The Bible
Friday, October 02
· Bishop facing child porn charges gets bail
Saturday, September 26
· Bridge fossil between Dinosaurs and Birds found
Monday, September 21
· Charles Darwin, too hot for the US
Sunday, September 13
· Eternally Earth Bound Pets
Tuesday, September 08
· Mother Angry that 16 yo Son was Baptized Without Consent

Older Articles

Freethought Books

Apparel
As seen at The Amazing Meeting!



Get Your Team Infidel Shirt

~ Click to purchase ~


 

All logos and trademarks in this site are property of their respective owner. The comments are property of their posters, all the rest © 1999 by Infidel Guy TM

* You can syndicate our news and blog using the file backend.php
* You can syndicate our forums using the file forumsbackend.php
* Our podcast RSS Feed (may change soon)
* Privacy Policy


The Infidel Guy Version 8.5 Coding provided by RavenPHPScripts and NukeCoder.com
social_bookmarks(); var gaJsHost = (("https:" == document.location.protocol) ? "https://ssl." : "http://www."); document.write(unescape("%3Cscript src='" + gaJsHost + "google-analytics.com/ga.js' type='text/javascript'%3E%3C/script%3E")); try { var pageTracker = _gat._getTracker("UA-11943904-3"); pageTracker._trackPageview(); } catch(err) {}
(Original PHP-Nuke Code Copyright © 2004 by Francisco Burzi)